Now that I've finished with my rant on the other thread

, I wanted to ask others' opinions regarding technology in the schools. Vonda Tencza's vision of the perfect elementary school, so she said last night, would include every child being issued their own individual laptop on the first day of school, along with a Kindle. The administrators are right now talking about adding more SMART boards to the classrooms, along with SMART tables in the lower grades, and "clickers" as well. In fact, right now my daughter is in the one second-grade class at GHS that is in possession of these "clickers" (just found this out last night). They are also talking about doing some work on the wireless network for the schools, to the tune of $70 K (I think that was the number I heard). Mentioned putting that into the CIP next year. Apparently wireless coverage is "spotty" right now--teachers have to go down the hall to access email, etc. They are discussing renewal of the computer lease.
Personally, I am uncomfortable with this idea of so much technology at such a young age. I don't want my kids spending all their time on computers. I don't want my kids reading a Kindle. We love books. An electronic screen isn't the same. We love to write. Look what kind of communication texting has encouraged in our society--kids can't even write anymore. It's all about How R U and other ridiculous abbreviations. I don't want my kids believing that the only way to accomplish anything is with the assistance of a gadget. Aren't we disconnected enough in today's society? I guess I feel like early reliance upon electronic gadgets is just going to pull kids away from interacting with other human beings. Not to mention the fact that all of this nifty technology is expensive! Is it really that important for second-graders to be fully immersed in technology?
One more thing to add--at the BOE meeting two weeks ago, there was a presentation of one of these SMART tables. It reminded me of an exhibit at the science museum in Hartford (I think that's where it is). Items appear on the table, and kids can manipulate them through touch--sorting, for example. Vonda kept saying that it was a way to encourage interaction between students. Someone (can't remember who) said something like "I can imagine them playing with this instead of in the block corner," like that was a good thing. That made me really uncomfortable. Is it really a good thing that, instead of communicating, interacting, and cooperating face-to-face, our kids will be interacting through an electronic gadget? Again, to me it felt like a depersonalization tool rather than a means of fostering personal interaction.