OK, so you all know that I'm pretty straightforward and don't like surprising people.
A Letter to the Editor from me is coming out in tomorrow's Rivereast, in which I state that I will be supporting the RHAM budget this year.
Why? Many reasons...
(1) RHAM used their stimulus money to create a new program for special education students (the Clinical Day Treatment Program) that will be funded with these stimulus funds for 1 1/2 years. If the program works, it will save taxpayers thousands and thousands of dollars over the years in terms of out-of-district tuition and transportation costs. Dr. Siminski publicly stated that if the program doesn't work, he'll be the first to drop it... but there are high hopes that the program will work.
(2) The Hebron Board of Education used their stimulus money to fund teacher salary accounts -- does that mean that we're stuck with those salaries forever?
(3) RHAM, for the next 2 years, is experiencing INCREASING student population. A 1.389% spending increase is acceptable for INCREASING student population, for which we as a community are responsible for. We're responsible for educating our Hebron students. I believe that all of us understand that and accept that responsibility. We've had some stellar students graduate from RHAM (even if they went to half-day kindergarten...)
(4) The Hebron Board of Education has DECLINING student population. A small (very small) increase might be acceptable, but not if the Board is going to move forward with unfunded, non-required programs like All Day Kindergarten, and... just two days after the highly attended Public Hearing... they hire a $100,000+ administrative position, a position that was questioned by the BOF and at the Public Hearing.
(5) The HBOE hired that administrative position -- funded strictly by local taxpayer money -- without posting the position so that other qualified candidates could apply, simply because they have a policy that they can do it. I believe that policy is illegal, but in this case it's legal to do it simply because they have the policy that allows them to do it. I want that policy revisited by a labor attorney. RHAM, on the other hand, has a similar policy, but posts ALL open positions. Recently, they posted for a Vice Principal at the Middle School, and had 78 applications. They involved board members and parents in making the decision. Recently, they posted an open Social Studies teacher, and had over 100 applicants. They "get it" and allow all qualified people to apply for the job(s) that you and I are paying for, and they allow you and I to have input on those decisions. It's still our money.
(6) Dr. Siminski has been extremely open, honest and transparent at public BOS and BOF meetings. He answers every question about every dollar. He answers in public, and he answers emails with detailed information.
(7) On the other hand, the Hebron Board of Education answers specific questions with "Don't worry about it.... it's all taken care of..." WHAT kind of answer is that?? Do they have a Sugar Daddy lined up, or is it just based on the fact that Connecticut debt is burying us all, we're all pretty much #$%^ over debt (that will be paid for by our future generations,) so what the heck? Why worry about more debt??? The kids will have to pay for it, so we adults should just not worry about it...
(8) If the RHAM budget is defeated, Dr. Siminski has already announced publicly the types of reductions he would make, without compromising quality. HOW open is that?
(9) If the Hebron Board of Education budget is passed, we will have no clue as to how our tax dollars will be spent for the betterment of Hebron elementary students because they voted DOWN their OWN budget??!!!
(10) If the Hebron Board of Education budget is defeated, just by the history of the past two months, we can expect the same stalling, non-answers, sometimes personal responses by a BOE member (such as "are you tone-deaf?")(that was a good one...)
(11) Because of their openness, and in studying the numbers in detail, I trust the honesty and integrity of RHAM Administration. If it goes down, they'll do the RIGHT thing for ALL students.
(12) Because of their secrecy and "Consent Agendas" (in which they approve $100,000+ administrative positions, which were NOT posted, and in which they did not allow public discussion because no one would second Kathy Shea's motion to discuss in public, just so the public could understand where their hard-earned money [or unemployment benefits] are going to), I do NOT trust the honesty and integrity of the Hebron Administration to do the RIGHT thing for ALL elementary students.
So, yes, folks, I'm voting Yes for RHAM, but until and unless something dramatically changes, I'm voting NO on the Town Budget because the Town Budget includes the Hebron Board of Education budget. I'm marking "Acceptable" on the RHAM budget on the advisory ballot.
I'm also voting Yes on CIP, with a notation on the Advisory Ballot that it is "Too Low."
It's so sad that we don't have bifurcation in this town, as so many other Connecticut municipalities do. That way, I could vote Yes on the General Government budget (a 0.22% increase) and No on the HBOE budget. I will, however, be noting on the Advisory Ballot that I believe the General Government budget is "Too Low", while I'm also voting that the Hebron Board of Education budget is "Too High"... simply because I have absolutely NO CLUE as to how they plan to spend my tax dollars.
But to make a point, stand on principals, and because of our current charter, I'm left in a position of being forced to vote NO on the total town budget.